2026-09-23 · 法律 · 9 min read

AI 內容授權:哪些內容你可以合法販售

簡短回答:在 Slloy,付費生成的內容都附有商業使用授權 —— 你可以將它用於廣告、商品列表與客戶專案。但「我可以賣它嗎?」其實是三個問題,不是一個,另外兩個問題分別涉及法律規範和你自己上傳的內容。本文將為你梳理清楚。

本指南僅提供一般性資訊,並非法律建議 —— 如果是高風險的宣傳活動,建議諮詢專業律師。儘管如此,2026 年的產業環境已經足夠穩定,你可以放心從容因應。

三個獨立的核心問題

1. 平台授權(最簡單的部分)

On Slloy: generations made with paid credits include a commercial-use license covering ads, e-commerce and social media, and failed runs are auto-refunded. Free-tier generations are for evaluation. When you deliver to clients, the practical hygiene is simple: generate on a paid balance, keep the order records, and point your client to the platform's terms when they ask where the license comes from. Other platforms differ meaningfully — some restrict commercial use to top tiers, some exclude it entirely on free plans. Always check before, not after, the billboard goes up.

2. 所有權(最容易讓人意外的部分)

In the United States, the Copyright Office's position is that purely AI-generated material — without meaningful human creative input — cannot be copyrighted. That does not mean you can't sell it; it means anyone else could theoretically use a similar image without infringing. Practical implications: your protective moat is your prompts, your reference assets and your brand, not copyright on the raw output. If you make substantial human modifications — compositing, retouching, arrangement into a larger work — those human-authored layers can be protectable. Jurisdictions outside the US treat AI authorship differently; the EU and others are still converging.

3. The safety checks before any delivery

The mindset shift

Licensing AI content is becoming routine commercial practice: agencies deliver it daily, stock-adjacent marketplaces have AI sections, and ad networks have published disclosure norms. The professionals who get burned are consistently the ones who skipped question 3 — usually via an uploaded photo they didn't have rights to. Get the uploads right, generate on a paid plan, document your chain — and sell with a clear conscience.

Jurisdiction quick notes (September 2026)

JurisdictionCopyright in AI outputPractical read
United StatesPurely AI-generated work isn't copyrightable without meaningful human authorship; human-modified layers can beSellable under platform license; protect via brand + prompts, not copyright on raw output
European UnionAuthor-centric framework; AI-assisted works with human creative input generally qualifyKeep evidence of your creative process (prompts, edits, selections)
United KingdomLongstanding computer-generated works provision, under active reviewWatch this space; contracts matter more than statute today
ChinaCourts have granted protection to AI-assisted works with substantial human input in specific casesDocument human contribution explicitly
JapanPermissive toward AI training and output; human authorship required for copyrightCommercial use broadly straightforward

The common thread across all five: document your human input. Prompt drafts, iteration history, edit layers, selection decisions — the record of creative direction is what transforms “AI output” into “work you directed,” and it's the difference that matters in every framework above.

Your delivery-day record-keeping checklist

The three questions clients actually ask

In practice, client conversations about AI content come down to three questions, and each has a one-line answer you can give with confidence. “Is this legal?” — Yes, when generated on a paid plan with licensed references and used per the platform's commercial terms. “Do we own it?” — You have full contractual commercial rights from the platform; raw AI output isn't copyrightable in some jurisdictions, so our brand and assets provide the protection. “Could someone copy it?” — They could prompt something similar; that's true of all photography too, and it's why the strategy layer (brand, series, consistency) is where the value sits. Teams that internalize these three answers deliver AI-assisted work daily without drama — because there isn't any, as long as the three checks above were done before delivery, not after.

This article is general information and does not constitute legal advice. Platform license terms govern your specific rights; read the current version at our terms page before commercial delivery.

Generate with commercial rights from day one
← Dreamina vs Slloy:哪個對國際用戶更友善?

相關文章

常見問題

我可以販售在 Slloy 生成的圖片與影片嗎?

可以 —— 使用付費點數生成的內容,依 Slloy 條款包含廣告、電子商務與社群媒體使用的商業授權。你仍需對自己上傳的所有照片擁有權利,並遵守你所在市場的廣告法規。

AI 生成內容的合法所有權歸誰?

依司法管轄區不同而異。在美國,沒有顯著人為創作的純 AI 生成作品目前無法取得版權,但你仍可依平台授權進行商業販售。其他多數司法管轄區規範不盡相同,請將「可擁有版權」和「可販售」視為兩個獨立問題。

交付 AI 內容給客戶前,我應該檢查什麼?

三項要點:你購買的方案對應的平台授權允許商業使用、你擁有所有上傳參考素材的權利(尤其是人物照片)、且內容未侵害商標,也不會誤導你所在市場的消費者。